SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. – August 11, 2026 – In the dynamic landscape of senior living, the pursuit of enhanced resident outcomes in memory care necessitates a profound shift beyond mere adherence to clinical protocols and regulatory mandates. A consensus emerged among leading experts at HEALTHTAC West 2026, underscoring the critical role of comprehensive staff training, fostering staff confidence, nuanced individualized responses to dementia-related expressions, and the deliberate granting of resident autonomy in daily life. These multifaceted elements, when harmonized, collectively shape the quality and efficacy of memory care.
n
The insightful discussion, aptly titled “Beyond the Care Plan: Training, Environment and Dignity in Memory Care,” unfolded during the second full day of the HEALTHTAC West 2026 conference, held from August 2nd to August 4th at the prestigious Phoenician resort in Scottsdale, Arizona. Verna Chisman, president of Allure & Wellness Management Services, adeptly moderated the session, guiding a panel of distinguished professionals through the intricate nuances of optimal memory care provision.
n
The esteemed panel comprised AJ Cipperly, vice president of memory care at The Arbor Company; Jaime Cobb-Tinsley, vice president of family & professional education at the James L. West Center for Dementia Care; Heidi McLester, executive director of Amber Creek Inn Memory Care; and Marcia Miranda, executive director of Silver Creek Inn Memory Care. Their collective expertise illuminated a path forward for memory care operators seeking to transcend conventional approaches and cultivate environments that truly nurture and respect individuals living with dementia.
n
The conversation commenced with an examination of workforce training initiatives, probing how memory care organizations can effectively ascertain the tangible return on investment from these crucial development programs. The dialogue then naturally progressed to explore the intricate ways in which staff interpret resident expressions, the strategic application of non-pharmacological interventions, and the delicate equilibrium between ensuring resident safety and preserving their autonomy and overall quality of life.
n
Measuring the Tangible Impact of Training
n
The imperative to quantify the value of training investments was a central theme. AJ Cipperly of The Arbor Company articulated the organization’s multifaceted approach to assessing the return on investment (ROI) from training programs. While acknowledging the inherent challenges in isolating the precise impact of training on metrics such as staff retention or resident satisfaction, Cipperly highlighted a recent initiative that provided more direct evidence of efficacy.
n
The Arbor Company observed a concerning uptick in workers’ compensation claims stemming from resident-related injuries sustained by team members. In response, the organization developed and implemented targeted training designed to mitigate this specific risk. “We developed a training to address that, and from that, we saw, you know, a decrease in our claims,” Cipperly reported, underscoring the direct correlation between a focused training intervention and a measurable positive outcome. This experience, she emphasized, served as a powerful affirmation of the value in aligning specific training endeavors with clearly defined objectives and observable results.
n
Jaime Cobb-Tinsley echoed this sentiment, detailing how the James L. West Center for Dementia Care meticulously tracks incidents and resident satisfaction. However, the center has also expanded its evaluative scope to include the critical dimension of caregiver confidence and trust within the organizational framework. “When our caregivers have confidence in the skills that they have gotten through training, whether it’s on-the-job training or it’s orientation or just the ongoing training that we do, that confidence helps them respond better in all interventions,” Cobb-Tinsley explained. This heightened confidence, she noted, directly translates into more effective and compassionate care delivery.
n
Furthermore, Cobb-Tinsley pointed to the significant engagement with the organization’s career ladder program as another key indicator of training effectiveness and employee investment. Approximately 90% of employees voluntarily participate in this program, a statistic the center closely correlates with its ROI calculations. This voluntary participation signifies a deep-seated belief in the value of continuous learning and professional development.
n
Expanding the Circle of Dementia Education
n
The discussion then broadened beyond measuring training outcomes to encompass the fundamental question of who within a memory care community requires specialized dementia education. Heidi McLester articulated a strong conviction that dementia-specific training cannot be confined solely to direct care workers. At Amber Creek Inn Memory Care, the commitment to education extends across all staff members, regardless of their specific role. “We do specific dementia training for all of our staff, whether they work in the kitchen, housekeeping, caregiving. It doesn’t matter,” McLester stated emphatically. This inclusive approach ensures that every individual interacting with residents possesses a foundational understanding of dementia and its implications.
n
McLester further elaborated on a program called “Personal Touch,” which reorients caregivers to perceive activities of daily living (ADLs) not as mere tasks, but as opportunities for meaningful human connection. For instance, assisting a resident with dressing transcends the functional act of clothing; it becomes a moment for reminiscence, engaging the resident in conversation about topics that hold personal significance. “It’s not just a task,” McLester explained. “It’s really making that connection with that resident, which ultimately makes that experience much easier.” This philosophy underscores the power of human connection in transforming routine care into enriching experiences.
n
The Profound Significance of Asking "Why?"
n
The emphasis on fostering connection seamlessly transitioned into the panel’s exploration of resident expressions, often referred to as behaviors. When staff are empowered to view residents as individuals rather than simply recipients of tasks, they are better equipped to discern the underlying messages conveyed by resident actions. Marcia Miranda highlighted a crucial tenet of training at her community: encouraging team members to inquire about the “why” behind a resident’s response, rather than immediately labeling the response itself as problematic.
n
“Why do you think your resident is acting that way? Is it that they are overstimulated? Is it that you triggered something that you didn’t know about, and this is how they’re reacting to you?” Miranda posed as examples of the critical questions caregivers are trained to ask. Understanding a resident’s personal history, she added, becomes instrumental in identifying potential triggers and formulating more sensitive and effective responses.
n
Jaime Cobb-Tinsley underscored the importance of intentional language in shaping caregiver perception. Her organization deliberately employs the term “expressions” over “behaviors,” a conscious linguistic shift designed to foster a more empathetic and curious approach to understanding what residents are attempting to communicate. “We’re not there to correct or control. We’re there to be curious,” she stated. This mindset is further reinforced by the organization’s trauma-informed training, which prompts staff to consider the individual’s life experiences rather than simply focusing on what might be perceived as “wrong.” Cobb-Tinsley shared a powerful mantra that resonates throughout her organization: “A person with dementia is not giving you a hard time; they are having a hard time.” This simple yet profound statement serves as a constant reminder to approach residents with compassion and understanding.
n
Individualizing Non-Pharmacological Interventions
n
Once staff are adept at exploring the “why” behind a resident’s response, the subsequent critical question becomes “what” to do with that insight, particularly before resorting to medication. AJ Cipperly cautioned against the uncritical application of commonly recommended non-pharmacological interventions, emphasizing that their efficacy is contingent upon personalization. “I could sit up here and say, ‘Oh, music therapy, horticultural therapy, getting them more involved in activities.’ These are all the things we always hear when somebody has a behavioral expression,” Cipperly acknowledged. “But the reality is, those things only work if they’re individualized and person-centered.”
n
Cipperly stressed the need for caregivers to possess practical, on-the-spot tools to de-escalate immediate situations, such as agitation or attempts to leave. Once the immediate concern is addressed, the team can then delve into understanding the root cause. “Was there a trigger? Were they hungry, thirsty, overstimulated?” she inquired. She cautioned against the automatic implementation of familiar activities without first discerning the underlying reasons for a resident’s actions. Even seemingly beneficial non-pharmacological approaches can become ineffective if applied repetitively without a genuine understanding of the individual’s needs and motivations. “But why are they trying to leave? What is it about where they are that they don’t like?” Cipperly urged.
n
Heidi McLester reinforced the critical importance of understanding the individual, asserting that no intervention can be truly effective when separated from the person receiving it. “There’s no game plan for dementia. There’s no, you know, linear path that everybody takes,” she stated. “You really have to get to know them individually as a person.”
n
Cipperly provided a compelling hypothetical example: a resident resisting a shower due to the water temperature being too cold. If the resident can no longer articulate their discomfort, this resistance might be misinterpreted as aggression associated with dementia, rather than a direct and understandable reaction to their immediate environment. “We’ve got to stop blaming the dementia,” Cipperly implored. She argued that preconceived notions about dementia can blind caregivers to readily solvable problems. “So, these behaviors that we often talk about are just normal reactions to an abnormal situation,” she concluded.
n
From Tasks to Meaningful Experiences
n
The practice of considering situations from the resident’s perspective served as a crucial bridge between the discussion of interventions and the cultivation of caregiver empathy. Jaime Cobb-Tinsley emphasized that while technical skills and intervention strategies are vital, they must be consistently reinforced with ongoing empathy training. “It’s the empathy. It’s, ‘How would you feel? How is your home set up?’” she articulated, highlighting the importance of fostering a deep sense of understanding and connection.
n
Heidi McLester noted that frontline caregivers often operate under considerable time pressure to complete numerous tasks, which can be detrimental if personal care is approached solely as a checklist. “When they look at caring for a resident as a task and not an experience with that resident, you know, that’s where the behaviors can come in because they don’t know how to approach,” she explained.
n
Marcia Miranda illustrated how this shift in perspective can profoundly alter a caregiver’s response to what might otherwise be perceived as a challenging behavior. She offered the example of a former bus driver who, exhibiting a daily desire to leave around 3 p.m., could be understood by staff familiar with his background. This timing, she explained, likely corresponds with a deeply ingrained work routine. Recognizing this, caregivers can respond with understanding and appropriate redirection, rather than simply labeling it as problematic. “The more you know about your resident, the better care you can provide,” Miranda stated, underscoring the power of personalized knowledge.
n
Navigating the Delicate Balance Between Dignity and Risk
n
This profound understanding of the resident naturally led to the concept of “dignity with risk,” as articulated by moderator Verna Chisman. This crucial aspect addresses the challenge of how memory care communities can preserve meaningful experiences for residents while simultaneously managing safety concerns. AJ Cipperly shared valuable insights gleaned from her visits to dementia care farms in the Netherlands two years prior. While acknowledging that a direct replication of the care-farm model might not be feasible, the experience ignited a significant internal discussion within The Arbor Company regarding how to foster greater resident freedom within their communities.
n
Cipperly revealed that some communities are exploring the integration of animals such as chickens, rabbits, and goats, while others are re-evaluating the necessity of constantly secured doors. The key, she emphasized, lies in adopting “incremental steps” towards creating “a path to more freedom.” She drew upon principles observed at the care farms, which centered on “freedom, independence and access to the outdoors.”
n
Jaime Cobb-Tinsley asserted that preserving a high quality of life for residents often necessitates a willingness to accept a certain degree of risk, rather than implementing overly restrictive measures solely to prevent potential injury. She underscored the importance of family education in helping relatives understand and embrace this delicate balance. Cobb-Tinsley candidly acknowledged that even with safety protocols in place, granting residents freedom inherently involves some level of risk. “But this is about life,” she stated, highlighting the fundamental human right to live fully.
n
Extending this perspective, Heidi McLester emphasized a commitment to providing residents with “the best day we can possibly give them every day, given the disease that they have.” Managing family expectations, she noted, is an integral part of this process, particularly when striving to uphold resident dignity while navigating the realities of dementia.
Miranda offered a poignant example from her community: a resident with a lifelong passion for gardening struggled with the transition into memory care. Staff ingeniously created an opportunity for her to continue tending to flowers in the community courtyard, with staff present to ensure her safety. “Now she has a purpose again,” Miranda shared. “She is doing something that she has always done her life, and we’ll continue to monitor until we see she’s not safe.” For the time being, this resident is able to engage in an activity that brings her immense joy and a sense of purpose.
Strategic Investments for the Future of Memory Care
As the session drew to a close, Chisman invited each panelist to identify a single strategic memory care investment or operational change they would prioritize in the coming twelve months. AJ Cipperly immediately reaffirmed her commitment to workforce development, stating, “I think it would be stronger workforce development strategies, both from a recruitment, retention and training perspective.” She articulated a foundational belief that no system or operational process can truly succeed without a stable, capable workforce to implement it. Training that cultivates caregiver confidence, she reiterated, also contributes significantly to family peace of mind and overall resident well-being.
Jaime Cobb-Tinsley concurred on the paramount importance of workforce development but also introduced a critical addition: fostering greater freedom within the physical environment. She urged operators to critically examine the number of inaccessible doors, cabinets, and drawers within their communities, posing the question of whether their own homes operate under such restrictive conditions. Many of these environmental adjustments, she noted, can be relatively inexpensive and involve a thoughtful reconsideration of space rather than the addition of costly amenities.
Heidi McLester advocated for a dual investment in both staff and the physical environment. “We have a whole budget just for employee appreciation every month, and we spend it,” she revealed. Ensuring that employees feel recognized and valued for the demanding nature of their work, McLester explained, cultivates a culture where caregivers are more likely to stay and where residents are consistently treated with dignity and respect.
In a similar vein, Marcia Miranda called for a deliberate investment in organizational culture. “Build the culture. Make your team feel like they are family and they are caring for a loved one,” she urged. This emphasis on fostering a familial atmosphere, she believes, is fundamental to providing truly compassionate care.
Concluding her remarks, AJ Cipperly connected these workforce investments to the broader future of the senior living industry. “All of us in this room today, we’re creating our future care environment,” she stated. “No matter if you’re a provider or a vendor.” This perspective positions workforce development not merely as an operational concern but as a long-term responsibility for the entire industry. “We’ve got to start training the people that are going to be caring for us one day,” she concluded, underscoring the profound generational impact of investing in today’s memory care workforce.
