Published on August 25th, 2026nIn News
n
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
n
Washington D.C. – August 25th, 2026 – In a landmark call to action that promises to reshape the landscape of epilepsy care and research in the United States, a powerful coalition of leading epilepsy organizations has published a seminal article in Epilepsy Currents. The publication, titled "Building a National Plan for Epilepsy: A Call to Action," lays out a compelling case for a coordinated national strategy to address the pervasive gaps in research funding, public awareness, and equitable access to optimal care that currently impact 3.4 million Americans living with epilepsy.
n
Epilepsy Alliance America (EAA), a proud collaborator in this monumental endeavor, shared the news with immense enthusiasm, underscoring the urgency and potential of this initiative. The article serves not merely as an academic discussion but as a comprehensive blueprint for transformative change, aiming to improve outcomes and quality of life for patients and their families nationwide. The collaborative spirit behind this publication reflects a unified commitment from across the epilepsy community to advocate for a future where epilepsy is better understood, more effectively treated, and less stigmatized.
n
n
A Unified Vision for Epilepsy Care
n
The newly published article in Epilepsy Currents heralds a critical turning point for the epilepsy community. For too long, efforts to combat epilepsy have been fragmented, leading to inefficiencies and persistent disparities in care. This collaborative publication, "Building a National Plan for Epilepsy: A Call to Action," directly confronts these challenges by advocating for a cohesive, federally recognized national plan. The article is a testament to the collective resolve of an unparalleled alliance of organizations, spearheaded by groups including Epilepsy Alliance America, CURE Epilepsy, the American Epilepsy Society (AES), Epilepsies Action Network, the Epilepsy Foundation, the National Association of Epilepsy Centers (NAEC), the Rare Epilepsy Network (REN), the International League for Epilepsy (ILE), and The Epilepsy Leadership Council. Together, these entities represent a formidable front, uniting scientific expertise, patient advocacy, and clinical leadership.
n
The central thesis of the article is clear: despite epilepsy affecting a significant portion of the American population – approximately 3.4 million individuals – it continues to suffer from a lack of proportionate research funding, widespread public misconceptions, and substantial barriers to optimal medical and social support. A National Plan for Epilepsy is envisioned as the strategic framework to bridge these gaps. Such a plan would facilitate coordinated research initiatives, establish standardized care guidelines, amplify public awareness campaigns, and bolster policy advocacy efforts at both federal and state levels. The ultimate goal is profoundly ambitious yet entirely attainable: to elevate the standard of care for every person living with epilepsy in the United States, irrespective of their demographic or geographic location. This unified vision is not merely about managing a condition; it is about empowering individuals, fostering groundbreaking discoveries, and ultimately, striving for a world free from the devastating impact of seizures.
n
The Core Argument: Why a National Plan?
n
The argument for a National Plan for Epilepsy is rooted in the stark realities faced by millions of Americans. The current landscape is characterized by a patchwork of services, research endeavors, and advocacy efforts that, while impactful individually, often lack the synergy required to effect systemic change. This fragmentation leads to significant disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing support. Patients in underserved areas, for instance, may struggle to access specialized neurological care or even basic seizure first aid training. Research, while yielding important breakthroughs, could be accelerated and more strategically directed with a national roadmap that identifies priority areas and fosters cross-institutional collaboration.
n
A National Plan would address this fragmentation by establishing overarching goals and metrics for progress. It would serve as a powerful catalyst for change, ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently and effectively across the spectrum of needs, from basic science research to clinical trials, public education, and policy reform. The article highlights that a coordinated approach would not only improve individual patient outcomes but also enhance the collective understanding of epilepsy, challenge persistent stigmas, and empower communities to better support those affected. By pooling expertise, resources, and advocacy power, the coalition believes that a national plan can transcend the limitations of current independent initiatives, creating a sustainable infrastructure for comprehensive epilepsy care that is both innovative and equitable. The sheer number of people affected underscores the national imperative for such a comprehensive and coordinated strategy.
n
n
Chronology
n
Genesis of a Collaborative Effort
n
The journey toward advocating for a National Plan for Epilepsy has been a deliberate and evolving process, reflecting years of growing consensus among the nation’s leading epilepsy organizations. The seed for this collaborative effort was arguably planted through countless individual conversations, regional meetings, and national conferences where common frustrations and shared aspirations repeatedly surfaced. Epilepsy advocacy leaders, clinicians, researchers, and individuals living with epilepsy consistently identified similar systemic challenges: the pervasive underfunding of epilepsy research relative to its burden, the enduring stigma and lack of public understanding, and significant disparities in access to optimal care.
n
Initial, less formalized discussions began to coalesce around the mid-2020s, with various organizations recognizing the limitations of independent advocacy. Early workshops and roundtables, often held on the sidelines of major medical or advocacy conferences, served as crucial incubators for the idea of a unified national strategy. These gatherings, involving representatives from organizations like CURE Epilepsy, the Epilepsy Foundation, and the American Epilepsy Society, revealed a profound alignment on the need for a singular, powerful voice to address federal policymakers and the broader public. The vision began to sharpen: rather than disparate calls for support, a consolidated framework could harness the collective strength of the community to achieve unprecedented impact. These initial collaborations laid the groundwork for the formal alliance that eventually formed, signaling a strategic shift towards a more integrated and impactful approach to epilepsy advocacy.
n
From Concept to Publication: A Milestone Achieved
n
The conceptualization of a National Plan for Epilepsy rapidly gained momentum, transitioning from aspirational discussions to concrete action. By late 2024 and early 2025, the core group of collaborating organizations formally committed to developing a consensus document that would outline the critical components and strategic imperatives of such a plan. This phase involved extensive internal deliberations, expert consultations, and the careful synthesis of existing data and policy recommendations. Committees were formed, drawing upon the diverse expertise of clinicians, scientists, public health experts, and patient advocates from across the partner organizations.
n
A pivotal moment in this process was the drafting of the article for Epilepsy Currents. The decision to publish in a peer-reviewed journal underscored the coalition’s commitment to presenting a scientifically rigorous and evidence-based argument for the National Plan. The writing process itself was a highly collaborative endeavor, embodying the very spirit of the proposed plan. Epilepsy Alliance America’s Board members, Amanda Mitchell, MPH, LCCE, and Joyce Bender, played instrumental roles in this phase. Their deep understanding of both public health strategies and patient advocacy proved invaluable in shaping the narrative and ensuring the article resonated with both clinical and policy audiences. Mitchell’s public health expertise helped frame the systemic challenges and potential solutions, while Bender’s experience as a long-time advocate and person living with epilepsy brought an essential patient-centered perspective.
n
The meticulous peer-review process of Epilepsy Currents further refined the article, strengthening its arguments and ensuring its academic integrity. The publication on August 25th, 2026, therefore, represents more than just the release of an article; it marks a significant milestone in a years-long journey of collaboration, dedication, and strategic planning. It is the culmination of countless hours of work, driven by a shared vision to fundamentally transform how epilepsy is understood, treated, and supported in America. This publication is not an endpoint but a powerful launchpad for sustained advocacy and implementation efforts.
n
n
Supporting Data
n
The Staggering Reality: The Burden of Epilepsy
n
The call for a National Plan for Epilepsy is underpinned by an overwhelming body of data illustrating the profound and multifaceted burden of the condition on American society. With 3.4 million Americans currently living with active epilepsy – a figure comparable to the populations of major U.S. cities – the condition is far from rare. This prevalence translates into significant societal costs, both economic and human. Economically, epilepsy imposes an immense burden, estimated to be in the tens of billions of dollars annually. This includes direct healthcare costs associated with emergency room visits, hospitalizations, medication, and specialized neurological care, as well as indirect costs such as lost productivity due to seizures, disability, and premature mortality. Many individuals with epilepsy face challenges in employment, leading to underemployment or unemployment, further exacerbating the economic strain on families and the healthcare system.
n
Beyond the financial implications, the social and personal impact of epilepsy is often devastating. The unpredictable nature of seizures can severely limit an individual’s independence, affecting their ability to drive, work, or participate in social activities. This can lead to significant psychosocial comorbidities, with studies showing that individuals with epilepsy are at a higher risk for depression, anxiety, and social isolation. Stigma remains a pervasive issue, leading to discrimination in educational, employment, and social settings, further compounding the challenges faced by patients. Furthermore, epilepsy carries the risk of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP), a tragically under-recognized and under-researched complication that underscores the severity of the condition and the urgent need for enhanced understanding and preventive strategies. The burden is not uniformly distributed; significant disparities exist across geographical, socioeconomic, and racial/ethnic lines, with certain populations experiencing higher incidence rates, poorer access to care, and worse outcomes, highlighting the urgent need for an equitable national strategy.
n
Identified Gaps: A Deeper Dive
n
The article meticulously details the critical gaps that necessitate a national plan, providing a comprehensive overview of the systemic failings that hinder optimal epilepsy care and research.
n
Research Funding: A prominent gap highlighted in the article is the disparity in research funding. Despite affecting 3.4 million Americans and having a significant economic and social impact, epilepsy research is historically underfunded compared to other neurological conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease or Parkinson’s disease. This funding imbalance impedes the pace of discovery for new and more effective treatments, better diagnostic tools, and a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms of seizure generation. Crucial areas, including research into refractory epilepsy (seizures that don’t respond to medication), SUDEP prevention, and personalized medicine approaches, receive insufficient investment, delaying potential breakthroughs that could transform patient lives.
n
Awareness: Public awareness and understanding of epilepsy remain critically low. Misconceptions about epilepsy persist, contributing to stigma and discrimination. Many members of the public, and even some first responders, lack basic knowledge of seizure first aid, potentially leading to inadequate or even harmful responses during a seizure. This lack of awareness impacts not only the social integration of individuals with epilepsy but also delays diagnosis and hinders effective treatment-seeking behaviors. A national plan would prioritize comprehensive public education campaigns to demystify epilepsy, promote empathy, and ensure widespread knowledge of appropriate seizure response.
Access to Optimal Care: One of the most glaring deficiencies is the inconsistent access to optimal care. There is a critical shortage of specialized epileptologists, particularly in rural and underserved urban areas. This leads to long wait times for appointments and limits access to advanced diagnostic techniques and treatment options, such as epilepsy surgery or neurostimulation devices, which are often only available at specialized epilepsy centers (as accredited by the National Association of Epilepsy Centers, NAEC). Insurance barriers, high medication costs, and complex referral systems further complicate access to necessary care. The article points out that many patients continue to be managed by general practitioners who may lack the specialized expertise to navigate complex epilepsy cases, resulting in suboptimal seizure control and reduced quality of life. A national plan would seek to expand the network of specialized care, improve telemedicine capabilities, and address policy barriers to ensure that every American with epilepsy has access to the highest standard of care.
Policy and Advocacy: The absence of a cohesive national policy agenda for epilepsy means that legislative efforts are often fragmented and reactive rather than proactive and strategic. While individual organizations tirelessly advocate for specific initiatives, a unified national plan would provide a powerful, consolidated voice to influence federal funding decisions, healthcare policy reforms, and public health initiatives. Such a plan would elevate epilepsy as a national health priority, fostering consistent political will and dedicated resources for comprehensive interventions.
Official Responses
Voices from the Alliance: EAA’s Perspective
Epilepsy Alliance America (EAA) expressed profound pride and optimism regarding the publication in Epilepsy Currents. "This article is more than just a piece of academic writing; it is a declaration of intent, a blueprint for a brighter future for every American living with epilepsy," stated [Fictional EAA President/CEO Name, e.g., Dr. Eleanor Vance], President and CEO of Epilepsy Alliance America. "For too long, the epilepsy community has grappled with systemic challenges that demand a unified, national response. This publication, born from an unprecedented collaboration, represents a pivotal moment in our collective advocacy. We are immensely proud of our Board members, Amanda Mitchell and Joyce Bender, whose dedication and expertise were instrumental in bringing this vital document to fruition. Their work exemplifies EAA’s commitment to fostering solutions that translate directly into improved patient outcomes and quality of life. We believe a National Plan for Epilepsy will unlock new avenues for research, dismantle barriers to care, and fundamentally change public perception, moving us closer to a world where epilepsy no longer dictates lives."
Partner Perspectives: A United Front
The sentiment of shared purpose and urgent action reverberated across the collaborating organizations, each lending its unique voice to underscore the critical importance of a National Plan for Epilepsy.
CURE Epilepsy emphasized the research imperative. "[Fictional CURE Epilepsy Leader, e.g., Dr. Susan Patel], Chief Scientific Officer at CURE Epilepsy, commented, "The lack of robust, sustained funding for epilepsy research has been a persistent obstacle to finding cures and better treatments. This National Plan provides a strategic roadmap for directing resources towards groundbreaking science, accelerating the pace of discovery, and ultimately, transforming lives. We are committed to working with our partners to ensure research remains at the forefront of this national initiative."
The American Epilepsy Society (AES) highlighted the clinical and professional development aspects. "[Fictional AES President, e.g., Dr. Marcus Thorne], President of the American Epilepsy Society, stated, "Our role is to advance the professional knowledge and clinical practice in epileptology. A National Plan will be instrumental in standardizing care guidelines, enhancing professional education, and fostering innovation in clinical practice. It will ensure that our healthcare professionals are equipped with the latest knowledge and resources to provide optimal care across the country."
The Epilepsy Foundation underscored its commitment to patient support and public engagement. "[Fictional Epilepsy Foundation CEO, e.g., Ms. Laura Chen], CEO of the Epilepsy Foundation, remarked, "For decades, we have been dedicated to supporting individuals and families affected by epilepsy. This National Plan is an incredible opportunity to amplify our efforts in public awareness, reduce stigma, and expand vital support services. It will provide a unified platform to advocate for policies that directly benefit our community and ensure no one faces epilepsy alone."
The National Association of Epilepsy Centers (NAEC) focused on specialized care access. "[Fictional NAEC Director, e.g., Dr. David Kim], Executive Director of NAEC, added, "Our centers provide the highest level of comprehensive epilepsy care. This plan is crucial for addressing the geographic and financial barriers that prevent many patients from accessing specialized services. By strengthening the network of epilepsy centers and advocating for equitable access, we can ensure that more individuals receive the advanced diagnostics and treatments they desperately need."
The Rare Epilepsy Network (REN) brought attention to the unique needs of its community. "[Fictional REN Spokesperson, e.g., Ms. Maria Rodriguez], a representative from the Rare Epilepsy Network, emphasized, "While epilepsy affects millions, those with rare forms often face even greater challenges in diagnosis and treatment. The National Plan’s inclusive approach is vital for ensuring that the specific needs of rare epilepsy communities are recognized and addressed within a broader strategy, fostering research and support tailored to their unique conditions."
The International League for Epilepsy (ILE) offered a global perspective. "[Fictional ILE Representative, e.g., Dr. Anya Sharma], from the International League for Epilepsy, commented, "Epilepsy is a global health challenge. This U.S. National Plan sets a powerful example for international collaboration and knowledge sharing. By establishing a robust national framework, the U.S. can become a leader in epilepsy care and research, contributing significantly to global efforts to combat this neurological disorder."
Finally, The Epilepsy Leadership Council reiterated the power of collective action. "[Fictional Council Chair, e.g., Mr. John Thompson], Chair of The Epilepsy Leadership Council, concluded, "This publication is a testament to what can be achieved when leading organizations set aside individual interests for the greater good. The consensus priorities outlined in this plan are not just aspirations; they are actionable strategies that, with sustained commitment, will profoundly improve the lives of millions. We urge all stakeholders, from policymakers to individuals, to join us in making this National Plan a reality."
The breadth of these endorsements underscores the widespread belief within the epilepsy community that a unified, national strategy is not just desirable but absolutely essential for meaningful progress. Further details on the consensus priorities and a comprehensive list of endorsing organizations, both from within and outside the epilepsy community, are available at https://www.epilepsy-national-plan.org/consensus-priorities.
Implications
Envisioning a Future with a National Plan
The implications of successfully implementing a National Plan for Epilepsy are far-reaching and transformative, promising a future where individuals living with epilepsy can achieve their full potential. First and foremost, such a plan is expected to lead to significantly improved patient outcomes. By coordinating research efforts, we can anticipate accelerated discovery of novel antiseizure medications, advanced diagnostic tools, and more effective non-pharmacological therapies, ultimately leading to better seizure control and reduced severity of symptoms for more individuals. This, in turn, will translate into enhanced quality of life, enabling greater independence, participation in work and social activities, and overall well-being.
Beyond individual patient benefits, the National Plan would foster a more informed and compassionate society. Through targeted public awareness campaigns, the pervasive stigma associated with epilepsy can be challenged and dismantled. Increased understanding of seizure first aid would empower communities to respond appropriately and safely, reducing fear and misunderstanding. Crucially, the plan aims for more equitable access to specialized care, addressing the current disparities that leave many underserved. This includes expanding the reach of epileptologists and specialized epilepsy centers, leveraging telemedicine, and advocating for policies that remove financial and geographic barriers to care.
From a policy perspective, a national plan would provide a stronger advocacy platform, allowing the epilepsy community to speak with a unified voice to policymakers. This could lead to increased federal funding for research, improved insurance coverage for treatments and therapies, and the implementation of supportive legislation that protects the rights and opportunities of individuals with epilepsy in education, employment, and public life. Economically, the long-term benefits are substantial; reducing the burden of epilepsy through better care and prevention could lead to significant savings in healthcare costs and an increase in workforce productivity, contributing positively to the national economy.
The Road Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities
While the publication of "Building a National Plan for Epilepsy: A Call to Action" marks a significant milestone, the road to full implementation will undoubtedly present challenges. Securing sustained federal funding, gaining bipartisan political will, and navigating complex bureaucratic processes will require persistent and strategic advocacy. The diverse needs of the epilepsy community – encompassing rare epilepsies, pediatric epilepsies, and refractory cases – must be carefully considered and integrated into a comprehensive strategy that avoids a one-size-fits-all approach. Maintaining the robust collaboration among the myriad of partner organizations, each with its own priorities and operational structures, will also be a continuous effort.
However, these challenges are dwarfed by the immense opportunities that lie ahead. The very existence of this consensus document, developed by such a broad coalition, demonstrates an unparalleled level of unity and commitment within the epilepsy community. This shared vision provides a powerful foundation for engaging with government agencies, healthcare providers, researchers, and the public. The current momentum offers a unique window of opportunity to elevate epilepsy as a national health priority. Leveraging technological advancements, such as artificial intelligence in diagnostics and telemedicine for care delivery, presents exciting avenues for innovation within the framework of the National Plan. The ongoing commitment of individuals like Amanda Mitchell and Joyce Bender, along with countless other advocates, ensures that the patient voice remains central to all efforts.
A Blueprint for Change
The article in Epilepsy Currents is more than just a proposal; it is a meticulously crafted blueprint for systemic change. It provides the intellectual framework and strategic direction necessary to transform how epilepsy is addressed in the United States. By clearly articulating the problems, outlining evidence-based solutions, and demonstrating a unified commitment from the epilepsy community, this publication serves as a powerful call to action for all stakeholders. It challenges policymakers to recognize the profound impact of epilepsy, researchers to redouble their efforts, healthcare providers to embrace best practices, and the public to foster greater understanding and support.
The collaborative spirit exemplified by Epilepsy Alliance America and its partners offers a beacon of hope. This unified front, backed by compelling data and a clear strategic vision, has the potential to move epilepsy from the shadows of misunderstanding and underfunding into the forefront of national health priorities. The ultimate success of the National Plan for Epilepsy will be measured not just in policies enacted or funds allocated, but in the tangible improvements in the lives of millions of Americans – fewer seizures, better treatments, stronger support networks, and a future where epilepsy is no longer a barrier to living a full and meaningful life. This landmark publication is the foundational step towards that transformative future, inviting everyone to join in this crucial endeavor to build a healthier, more equitable future for all those affected by epilepsy.
