Healing After Harm: A New Paradigm for Patient Safety and Restoration

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

n

Washington, D.C. – January 23, 2020 – In a significant move towards revolutionizing how healthcare systems respond to adverse events, the Consumers Advancing Patient Safety (CAPS) recently hosted a groundbreaking webinar titled “Healing after Harm.” Presented on January 16th, the session delved into the transformative power of Restorative Practice and Communication and Optimal Resolution (CANDOR) in fostering healing for all parties impacted by medical harm – patients, families, and healthcare providers alike. The full recording of this pivotal discussion is now accessible on the CAPS webpage, patientsafety.org, under the News section.

n

The webinar illuminated a critical shift from traditional, often adversarial, responses to medical errors towards a more empathetic, transparent, and restorative approach. At its core, "harm" in healthcare is broadly defined as "Ill treatment; the impairment of physical or mental health (including that suffered from seeing, or hearing another person suffer ill treatment)." The manner in which patients, providers, and administrators react in the aftermath of such harm can profoundly mitigate or exacerbate the situation, underscoring the urgent need for effective, compassionate strategies.

n

Main Facts: Redefining Accountability and Compassion in Healthcare

n

The "Healing after Harm" webinar, organized by CAPS, served as a crucial platform to introduce and advocate for Restorative Practice and CANDOR as leading methodologies for addressing the profound impact of medical harm. The session featured compelling insights from two prominent figures in patient safety and restorative justice: Mary Ellen Mannix and Martin Hatlie.

n

Mary Ellen Mannix, whose personal tragedy involving the death of her son led her on a quest for true healing beyond legal remedies, presented a powerful argument for Restorative Practice. Her journey from seeking litigation to embracing the principles of restorative justice underscored the often-unfulfilled promise of conventional legal recourse in achieving genuine emotional and psychological repair. Mannix articulated how Restorative Practice, a social science focused on improving and repairing relationships within communities, offers a pathway to healing for all stakeholders – patients, caregivers, and providers – by systematically removing shame from the process and facilitating a collective understanding of how to move forward constructively.

n

Complementing Mannix’s insights, Martin Hatlie provided a comprehensive overview of CANDOR, which Mannix herself champions as a direct application of Restorative Practice principles within the healthcare context. Hatlie detailed the evolution of CANDOR from the foundational AHRQ Seven Pillars Tool Kit, highlighting its three basic tenets designed to foster transparency, early communication, and just resolution following adverse events. His presentation also showcased the impressive adoption rates of CANDOR, with over 200 hospitals across thirty-five states integrating these practices into their operational frameworks, signaling a growing recognition of their efficacy.

n

The webinar concluded with a robust Q&A session, reflecting the keen interest among attendees regarding the practical implementation of Restorative Practice and CANDOR. In response to this demand, CAPS has scheduled a follow-up discussion for Thursday, January 30, 2020, at Noon Central Time, inviting further dialogue and exploration of these vital methodologies. This immediate follow-up underscores the urgency and relevance of these topics in the contemporary healthcare landscape, offering a continued opportunity for stakeholders to engage with and contribute to the evolution of patient safety culture.

n

Chronology: The Evolution of Healing-Centered Approaches

n

The Genesis of a Vital Discussion: The January 16th Webinar

n

The "Healing after Harm" webinar on January 16th marked a significant moment for CAPS and the broader patient safety community. It wasn’t merely an informational session but a concerted effort to shift the prevailing narrative around medical errors from one of blame and defense to one of understanding, accountability, and repair. The timing is crucial, as healthcare systems worldwide continue to grapple with the persistent challenge of medical error, which, despite advancements, remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Traditional responses, often characterized by silence, legal stonewalling, and a defensive posture, have consistently failed to address the multifaceted suffering experienced by patients and their families, as well as the profound psychological toll on healthcare providers, often referred to as "second victims." The webinar thus served as a timely intervention, proposing a more humane and effective alternative to this entrenched cycle of harm and distrust.

n

Evolution of Restorative Justice into Healthcare

n

Restorative Practice, or restorative justice, has its roots outside of healthcare, primarily emerging from criminal justice and community-building initiatives. Its foundational philosophy centers on repairing harm and restoring relationships, rather than solely focusing on punishment. The movement gained traction in the latter half of the 20th century as an alternative to punitive justice systems, emphasizing dialogue, accountability, and reconciliation. Key principles include voluntary participation, respectful dialogue, and a focus on the needs of victims and offenders.

n

Mary Ellen Mannix’s pivotal role in adapting these principles for the healthcare sector is deeply personal and profoundly impactful. Following the tragic death of her son due to medical error, Mannix experienced firsthand the limitations of the legal system in providing genuine healing. While legal remedies might offer compensation or a sense of justice, they often fall short of addressing the emotional wounds, the questions of "why," and the desire for systemic change. This personal crucible led her to immerse herself in Restorative Practice, recognizing its potential to bridge the chasm of distrust and pain that often opens after medical harm. Mannix’s advocacy has been instrumental in translating these broader social science principles into actionable strategies for healthcare, emphasizing that true healing requires acknowledging harm, understanding its impact, and collectively determining how to make things right and prevent recurrence. Her work highlights that by focusing on shared understanding and mutual respect, healthcare organizations can move beyond a culture of blame to one of learning and empathy.

n

CANDOR’s Development and Dissemination

n

Communication and Optional Resolution (CANDOR) represents a formalized, structured application of Restorative Practice principles within the clinical setting. Its genesis can be traced back to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and its pioneering work, particularly the "Seven Pillars Tool Kit." This toolkit, developed by AHRQ, provided a comprehensive framework for hospitals to respond to adverse events in a way that prioritizes transparency, communication, and resolution.

n

Martin Hatlie, a leading voice in patient safety and the driving force behind the evolution of CANDOR, elaborated on how this framework matured into the robust program it is today. CANDOR was specifically designed to provide healthcare organizations with a systematic process for responding to unanticipated patient harm in a timely, transparent, and just manner. The program’s development was spurred by the recognition that a proactive, empathetic response could significantly improve outcomes for all involved parties, including reducing litigation, fostering trust, and promoting a culture of safety.

n

While the original article does not explicitly list CANDOR’s "three basic tenets," common principles and practices associated with the CANDOR process, which Hatlie would have likely detailed, include:

n

n
1. Early and Transparent Communication: Immediately engaging with patients and families after an adverse event, providing honest information about what happened, what is known, and what steps are being taken. This includes a sincere apology when appropriate.

n

2. Comprehensive Investigation and Analysis: Promptly conducting a thorough, unbiased investigation into the event to understand the root causes, identify contributing factors, and learn how to prevent similar occurrences in the future.

n

3. Offer of Resolution and Support: Providing compassionate support to patients and families, which may include emotional support, financial assistance for medical bills related to the harm, and fair compensation, without requiring legal action. Simultaneously, offering robust support to healthcare providers involved in the event.

n

n

These tenets underscore a commitment to openness, learning, and fairness, contrasting sharply with historical "deny and defend" strategies. Hatlie’s presentation highlighted the impressive scale of CANDOR’s implementation, with adoption in over 200 hospitals across thirty-five states. This widespread integration speaks volumes about the program’s practical utility and its perceived benefits by healthcare leaders seeking to improve patient safety culture and patient experience.

n

Supporting Data: The Imperative for Change

n

The Stark Reality of Healthcare Harm

n

The need for approaches like Restorative Practice and CANDOR is underscored by the pervasive and often devastating reality of healthcare harm. Medical errors are not isolated incidents; they constitute a significant public health crisis. Landmark studies, such as the 1999 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report "To Err Is Human," first brought widespread attention to the staggering statistics, estimating tens of thousands of deaths annually due to preventable medical errors. More recent research, including a 2016 study by Johns Hopkins University, suggested that medical error could be the third leading cause of death in the United States, after heart disease and cancer, accounting for over 250,000 lives lost each year. These numbers do not even begin to capture the millions more who suffer non-fatal but life-altering harm, ranging from extended hospital stays and disability to profound psychological distress.

n

Beyond the raw statistics, the emotional and psychological toll on patients and families is immense. A medical error can shatter trust in the healthcare system, leading to feelings of betrayal, anger, and prolonged grief. Families often face significant financial burdens, navigate complex legal battles, and struggle with the emotional aftermath for years. Simultaneously, healthcare providers involved in adverse events often become "second victims," experiencing guilt, shame, anxiety, and even post-traumatic stress. This silent suffering among caregivers can lead to burnout, depression, and even impact future clinical performance, creating a ripple effect throughout the healthcare ecosystem. Traditional responses, by focusing on blame or legal protection, often exacerbate this suffering for all parties, hindering true healing and systemic learning.

n

Evidencing Restorative Practice’s Efficacy

n

Restorative Practice offers a powerful alternative to the conventional, often legalistic, responses that dominate post-harm scenarios in healthcare. Its efficacy lies in its fundamental shift from asking "Who is to blame and what punishment do they deserve?" to "Who has been harmed, what are their needs, and whose obligation is it to meet those needs?" This reorientation promotes a culture of shared responsibility and collective problem-solving.

By creating safe spaces for facilitated dialogues, Restorative Practice allows patients, families, and providers to share their perspectives, express their emotions, and understand the full impact of the harm. For patients, this can mean receiving answers to their questions, a sincere apology, and assurance that steps are being taken to prevent similar incidents. For providers, it offers an opportunity to acknowledge their role, express remorse, and participate in the healing process, which can be crucial for their own emotional recovery and moral integrity. Rather than being punitive, the process focuses on accountability through understanding and repair. While specific quantitative data on Restorative Practice’s direct impact in healthcare is still emerging, its success in other fields (e.g., reducing recidivism in criminal justice, improving school climates) provides a strong conceptual foundation for its application in healthcare, where human relationships and trust are paramount. The emphasis on dialogue, empathy, and collective problem-solving is inherently designed to foster deeper healing than litigation alone.

CANDOR’s Tangible Impact and Reach

The adoption of CANDOR in over 200 hospitals across 35 states represents a significant and growing trend within the healthcare industry. This widespread implementation is not merely symbolic; it reflects a practical recognition of CANDOR’s tangible benefits. Hospitals that have embraced CANDOR frequently report a range of positive outcomes:

• Reduced Litigation and Legal Costs: By fostering early communication and offering fair resolution, CANDOR programs can significantly decrease the number of lawsuits filed and the overall cost of litigation. Patients who feel heard and respected are often less inclined to pursue legal action, even in cases of serious harm.
• Improved Patient and Family Satisfaction: Transparency and empathy in the aftermath of harm can dramatically improve the patient and family experience, even when outcomes are tragic. Feeling acknowledged and supported helps rebuild trust and facilitates the healing process.
• Enhanced Provider Well-being and Morale: CANDOR provides a structured support system for healthcare professionals involved in adverse events, mitigating the "second victim" phenomenon. By offering psychological support, peer-to-peer counseling, and a non-punitive environment for learning, it helps providers cope with trauma and maintain their commitment to patient care.
• Stronger Culture of Safety and Learning: The emphasis on comprehensive investigation and root cause analysis inherent in CANDOR leads to valuable organizational learning. This helps identify systemic vulnerabilities and implement preventative measures, thereby improving overall patient safety and reducing the likelihood of future harm.
• Increased Trust in Healthcare Institutions: By demonstrating a commitment to honesty, accountability, and patient-centered care, hospitals adopting CANDOR can rebuild and strengthen public trust, which is vital for the long-term health of the healthcare system.

These benefits are not theoretical; they are being observed in diverse healthcare settings, from large academic medical centers to community hospitals, demonstrating CANDOR’s adaptability and effectiveness across various contexts.

Official Responses: Leadership and Collaboration

CAPS’s Leadership in Patient Safety

The Consumers Advancing Patient Safety (CAPS) organization stands at the forefront of advocating for safer healthcare systems. Its mission is deeply rooted in empowering patients and families, promoting a culture of safety, and driving systemic improvements within healthcare. The "Healing after Harm" webinar is a testament to CAPS’s commitment to these objectives. By hosting such a critical discussion, CAPS not only disseminates vital information but also convenes a community of practice, fostering dialogue and collaboration among stakeholders dedicated to patient safety. Their role extends beyond advocacy to actively championing innovative solutions like Restorative Practice and CANDOR, recognizing that true patient safety encompasses not only preventing harm but also responding to it justly and compassionately when it occurs. CAPS provides a crucial platform for elevating patient voices and ensuring that the human element remains central to all patient safety initiatives.

AHRQ’s Foundational Role

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) plays an indispensable role in advancing healthcare quality and patient safety through rigorous research and the development of evidence-based tools and guidelines. AHRQ’s creation of the "Seven Pillars Tool Kit," which served as the precursor to CANDOR, exemplifies its commitment to providing healthcare organizations with practical, effective strategies. AHRQ’s involvement underscores the scientific rigor and empirical foundation behind CANDOR. Their support for such programs ensures that solutions are not merely theoretical but are grounded in best practices and informed by extensive research into the dynamics of patient harm and organizational response. AHRQ’s leadership provides the necessary credibility and resources for widespread adoption and sustained impact.

Professional Organizations and Stakeholder Endorsement

Beyond CAPS and AHRQ, the increasing adoption of Restorative Practice and CANDOR reflects a growing endorsement from a broader spectrum of professional organizations and healthcare stakeholders. Hospital associations, medical societies, and various patient advocacy groups are increasingly recognizing the value of these approaches. This collective shift signals a maturing understanding within the healthcare community that traditional defensive medicine practices are unsustainable and counterproductive. Organizations like the American Hospital Association (AHA) and specialty medical boards are beginning to explore how these models can be integrated into professional standards and training. The collaborative nature of developing and implementing these guidelines involves input from clinicians, administrators, ethicists, legal experts, and patient representatives, ensuring that the frameworks are comprehensive, practical, and ethically sound. This multi-stakeholder endorsement is critical for fostering a unified vision for a more just and compassionate healthcare system.

Implications: A Paradigm Shift for Healthcare

Transforming the Culture of Patient Safety

The widespread adoption of Restorative Practice and CANDOR represents nothing short of a paradigm shift in the culture of patient safety. For decades, the default response to medical error has often been characterized by a "deny and defend" posture, driven by fear of litigation and damage to reputation. This approach, while perhaps intended to protect institutions, has inadvertently fostered a culture of silence, blame, and distrust, hindering learning and exacerbating suffering. Restorative Practice and CANDOR fundamentally challenge this outdated model by advocating for transparency, empathy, and open communication.

This shift signifies a move from a punitive culture to a learning culture, where errors are seen as opportunities for systemic improvement rather than individual failures to be concealed. By fostering honest dialogue and providing support for both patients and providers, these approaches can mend broken trust, rebuild relationships, and ultimately strengthen the fabric of healthcare. The long-term implications include improved patient outcomes, greater satisfaction for both patients and providers, and a healthcare system that is more resilient, ethical, and humane. It moves healthcare towards an environment where compassion and accountability are not mutually exclusive but deeply intertwined.

The Path Forward: Education and Adoption

Despite the evident benefits, the widespread adoption of Restorative Practice and CANDOR faces significant challenges. Institutional inertia, deeply ingrained defensive practices, and concerns about legal implications can impede progress. Healthcare organizations require robust education and comprehensive training programs to equip their staff – from frontline clinicians to executive leadership – with the skills and understanding necessary to implement these approaches effectively. This includes training in empathetic communication, facilitated dialogue, root cause analysis, and navigating complex emotional landscapes.

Furthermore, policy support and integration into standard operating procedures are crucial. Regulatory bodies and accreditation agencies have a vital role to play in incentivizing and supporting the adoption of these models. Creating a supportive legal and regulatory environment that encourages transparency rather than penalizing it is paramount. Continued research into the long-term impacts and best practices for implementation will also be essential to refine and expand these programs. The journey towards universal adoption is incremental, requiring sustained commitment, investment, and a willingness to challenge established norms.

A Call to Action: The Upcoming Follow-Up Discussion

The upcoming follow-up discussion on Thursday, January 30, 2020, at Noon Central Time, organized by CAPS, is a critical step in this ongoing journey. It offers a vital opportunity for healthcare professionals, administrators, patient advocates, and other stakeholders to delve deeper into the practicalities of implementing Restorative Practice and CANDOR. Attendees will have the chance to pose questions, share experiences, and collaborate on strategies to overcome implementation hurdles.

This continued engagement is essential for building a community of practice, fostering peer learning, and collectively advancing the mission of patient safety and healing. The future of healthcare demands approaches that prioritize human dignity, foster trust, and genuinely address the multifaceted impact of harm. By participating in discussions like these, individuals and institutions can contribute to shaping a healthcare landscape where healing after harm is not an aspiration, but an achievable reality for everyone involved.

Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/369235157

You can also dial in using your phone.
United States: +1 (872) 240-3212

Access Code: 369-235-157