For immediate release
n
January 20, 2020 – In a critical examination of how the healthcare system responds to adverse events, the Center for Patient Safety (CAPS) recently hosted a pivotal webinar titled "Healing After Harm." Presented on January 16, the session delved into innovative approaches that prioritize healing and resolution for all parties involved in healthcare harm – patients, their families, and the dedicated providers. The full recording of this insightful webinar is now accessible under the "News" section of the CAPS webpage, patientsafety.org, serving as an invaluable resource for institutions and individuals committed to fostering a more empathetic and effective response to medical incidents.
n
The webinar underscored a fundamental redefinition of "harm" within the healthcare context: "Ill treatment; the impairment of physical or mental health (including that suffered from seeing, or hearing another person suffer ill treatment)." This broad definition acknowledges the profound and often multifaceted impact of adverse events, recognizing that the emotional and psychological toll can extend far beyond the direct recipient of care to family members and even the healthcare professionals themselves. A central tenet of the discussion was the critical role of response: how patients, providers, and administrators react in the aftermath of harm can either exacerbate the pain and trauma or pave a constructive path towards understanding, accountability, and ultimately, healing.
n
The January 16th session brought together leading voices in patient safety and restorative justice, highlighting a growing movement towards practices that move beyond the traditional adversarial framework of litigation. Speakers Mary Ellen Mannix and Martin Hatlie presented compelling arguments and practical frameworks for integrating restorative principles into healthcare, offering a beacon of hope for a system often grappling with the aftermath of medical errors.
n
The Unseen Wounds: Understanding Healthcare Harm and Its Traditional Responses
n
Healthcare, by its very nature, is a complex human endeavor fraught with inherent risks. Despite the best intentions and rigorous training of professionals, errors and unintended adverse events are an unfortunate reality. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that millions of patients suffer injuries or die every year due to unsafe healthcare, with a significant proportion of these incidents being preventable. Beyond the immediate physical consequences, the psychological and emotional trauma for patients and their families can be devastating and long-lasting. Trust in the healthcare system erodes, and the path to recovery can be arduous.
n
Traditionally, when harm occurs, the response has often been characterized by a defensive posture. Healthcare institutions, fearing litigation and reputational damage, may adopt strategies that limit disclosure, discourage open communication, and prioritize legal protection. This often leaves patients and families feeling unheard, disrespected, and further victimized, pushing them towards legal remedies not necessarily for financial gain, but often for answers, accountability, and a sense of justice that the system otherwise fails to provide.
n
However, this adversarial model rarely leads to true healing for any party. For patients, legal battles can be protracted, emotionally draining, and, even with a favorable outcome, may not provide the emotional closure or understanding they seek. For healthcare providers, the experience of being involved in an adverse event can be deeply traumatizing, leading to feelings of guilt, shame, anxiety, and even post-traumatic stress – a phenomenon increasingly recognized as the "second victim" experience. These providers, often dedicated professionals, suffer in silence, impacting their well-being, their professional confidence, and potentially their ability to provide future care. The traditional system, focused on blame and punishment, offers little support for these second victims, perpetuating a cycle of silent suffering and hindering organizational learning.
n
It is against this backdrop that the "Healing After Harm" webinar presented a compelling alternative, championing approaches that seek to mend relationships, restore trust, and foster a culture of open learning rather than concealment.
n
Chronology of a Paradigm Shift: From Litigation to Restoration
n
The journey towards integrating restorative practices into healthcare is a testament to the evolving understanding of patient safety and the human toll of adverse events. For too long, the default response to harm was dictated by legal frameworks, often leading to prolonged, costly, and emotionally draining processes that satisfied neither the patient’s need for answers nor the provider’s need for healing.
n
The Catalyst for Change: A Personal Journey
n
The webinar’s insights into Restorative Practice were powerfully introduced by Mary Ellen Mannix, whose personal tragedy catalyzed her advocacy for a more humane approach. Following the devastating death of her son due to medical harm, Mannix initially pursued traditional legal remedies. Her experience, however, revealed a profound disconnect: while legal actions might offer a measure of accountability or financial compensation, they often fell short of providing genuine healing. The adversarial nature of litigation, she explained, frequently exacerbated the emotional wounds, failing to address the deeper human needs for understanding, empathy, and reconciliation.
n
Driven by this realization, Mannix embarked on a transformative path, immersing herself in the study of Restorative Practice. This social science, rooted in principles of repairing relationships and communities, offered a stark contrast to the punitive focus of conventional justice systems. Mannix’s work bridges the gap between these two worlds, demonstrating how the core tenets of Restorative Practice – respectful dialogue, mutual understanding, and collaborative problem-solving – can be profoundly beneficial within the healthcare setting.
n
The Evolution of CANDOR: A Structured Framework
n
Building upon the philosophical underpinnings of Restorative Practice, the Communication and Optimal Resolution (CANDOR) process emerged as a structured, proactive framework for responding to adverse events. Martin Hatlie, a prominent figure in patient safety, detailed the evolution of CANDOR during the webinar. Hatlie explained that CANDOR originated from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Seven Pillars Tool Kit, a comprehensive guide designed to help healthcare organizations develop effective communication and resolution programs.
n
The AHRQ Seven Pillars identified key components for a robust response to patient harm, including organizational commitment, early reporting, event investigation, communication and apology, care for the second victim, resolution, and system improvement. CANDOR essentially operationalized these pillars, translating them into a practical, implementable process.
n
Hatlie outlined three basic tenets that form the bedrock of the CANDOR process:
n
- n
- Early and Transparent Communication: This principle emphasizes the importance of promptly and openly communicating with patients and their families after an adverse event. It involves acknowledging what happened, expressing empathy, and providing factual information as it becomes available, even when the full picture is not yet clear. This transparency is crucial for building and maintaining trust.
- Thorough and Timely Investigation: CANDOR mandates a swift, comprehensive, and non-punitive investigation into the root causes of the event. The focus is on system-level factors and learning, rather than individual blame. This investigation informs corrective actions and prevents recurrence.
- Offer of Resolution and Support: When harm has occurred, CANDOR advocates for an offer of fair and timely resolution, which may include compensation for damages, an apology, and ongoing support for the patient and family. Crucially, it also includes robust support systems for healthcare providers involved, recognizing their emotional needs as "second victims."
n
n
n
n
These tenets collectively aim to transform the response to harm from a reactive, defensive stance to a proactive, compassionate, and learning-oriented approach. Hatlie’s presentation highlighted how CANDOR, when implemented effectively, fundamentally shifts the dynamic, fostering an environment where healing, learning, and prevention can truly flourish.
n
Supporting Data and Real-World Impact: The Growing Momentum of CANDOR
n
The "Healing After Harm" webinar was not merely a theoretical discussion; it was grounded in tangible evidence of success. Martin Hatlie shared compelling data on the widespread adoption and positive impact of the CANDOR process across the United States. His presentation served as a powerful testament to the efficacy of these restorative approaches.
n
Hatlie reported that the CANDOR practice has been embraced by over 200 hospitals nationwide. This significant uptake underscores a growing recognition within the healthcare industry of the limitations of traditional responses and the profound benefits of a more open and empathetic framework. The fact that facilities in thirty-five states have adopted CANDOR demonstrates a broad, geographical acceptance and suggests a widespread shift in patient safety culture across diverse healthcare systems, from large academic medical centers to smaller community hospitals.
n
The implications of this widespread adoption are multifaceted and profoundly positive:
n
- n
- Improved Patient and Family Experience: By prioritizing open communication, genuine apologies (where appropriate), and swift resolution, CANDOR significantly improves the experience of patients and families who have suffered harm. They report feeling heard, respected, and involved in the process, which is critical for their emotional healing and for restoring trust in the healthcare system. Studies and anecdotal evidence from CANDOR-implementing institutions often point to reduced patient and family anger and a greater willingness to engage constructively.
- Reduced Litigation and Costs: While not its primary goal, a significant benefit of CANDOR is a demonstrable reduction in medical malpractice lawsuits and their associated legal costs. When hospitals communicate openly, investigate thoroughly, and offer fair resolution, patients are less likely to pursue litigation. This proactive approach saves considerable resources that can then be reinvested into patient care and safety improvement initiatives. Some early adopters of CANDOR have reported substantial decreases in litigation rates and legal expenses, sometimes by as much as 50% or more.
- Enhanced Provider Well-being and Retention: CANDOR’s emphasis on supporting "second victims" is crucial. By providing psychological support, peer mentoring, and a non-punitive environment for disclosure and learning, healthcare organizations can mitigate the trauma experienced by providers involved in adverse events. This fosters a culture where providers feel safe to report errors, learn from them, and continue their work without the debilitating burden of shame or fear. Improved provider morale and reduced burnout contribute to better staff retention and a more stable, experienced workforce.
- Stronger Organizational Learning and Safety Culture: The commitment to transparent investigation and system-level analysis inherent in CANDOR drives continuous quality improvement. When errors are openly discussed, thoroughly analyzed for root causes, and corrective actions are implemented, the entire organization learns. This fosters a robust safety culture where transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement are prioritized, ultimately leading to fewer adverse events in the future. Data from implementing hospitals often shows an increase in incident reporting, not because more errors are occurring, but because staff feel safer to report them, which is a positive indicator of a healthy safety culture.
- Restoration of Trust: Perhaps the most profound impact of CANDOR is its ability to restore trust – between patients and providers, within healthcare teams, and between the community and the institution. In an era where public trust in institutions is often fragile, a transparent and compassionate response to harm can rebuild vital relationships.
The data presented by Hatlie clearly illustrates that CANDOR is not just a theoretical ideal but a proven, practical framework delivering tangible benefits across the healthcare landscape. Its widespread adoption signals a significant shift in how healthcare leaders perceive and respond to harm, moving towards a more humane, efficient, and ultimately safer system.
Official Responses and the Imperative for Open Dialogue
The enthusiastic response to the "Healing After Harm" webinar, as evidenced by the numerous questions from attendees, underscores the urgent need for ongoing dialogue and practical guidance in implementing restorative practices and CANDOR. Healthcare leaders, patient safety officers, risk managers, and frontline providers are actively seeking strategies to embed these principles into their daily operations.
The Center for Patient Safety (CAPS), recognizing this strong interest and the complexity of cultural and systemic change, has taken a proactive step to facilitate this crucial conversation. In response to the high volume of inquiries and the evident desire for deeper engagement, CAPS has scheduled a dedicated follow-up discussion. This session is designed to address the nuanced questions raised during the initial webinar and to foster a collaborative environment where participants can share insights, challenges, and best practices.
This official response from CAPS signifies their commitment not only to raising awareness about critical patient safety issues but also to providing tangible support and platforms for continued learning and implementation. By offering a direct forum for discussion, CAPS is empowering healthcare professionals to navigate the complexities of adopting restorative approaches, helping them to overcome potential barriers such as legal concerns, staff training needs, and the inherent resistance to cultural change that often accompanies such paradigm shifts.
The follow-up discussion is a critical component of the ongoing effort to normalize open communication, apology, and resolution within healthcare. It provides an opportunity to:
- Clarify implementation details: Attendees can ask specific questions about the practical steps involved in rolling out CANDOR or integrating Restorative Practice principles.
- Address legal and ethical considerations: Concerns about legal implications of open disclosure and apology are common. The session can provide guidance on navigating these issues within existing regulatory frameworks.
- Share success stories and challenges: Participants can learn from peers who have already embarked on this journey, gaining valuable insights into what works and what obstacles to anticipate.
- Foster a community of practice: By connecting individuals and institutions grappling with similar challenges, the discussion helps build a network of support and shared learning.
This proactive engagement from CAPS reinforces the message that transitioning to a restorative model is a collaborative journey that requires ongoing education, support, and a shared commitment from the entire healthcare community.
Implications for the Future of Patient Safety
The "Healing After Harm" webinar and the subsequent follow-up discussion carry profound implications for the future trajectory of patient safety and healthcare quality. They signal a maturing understanding within the medical community that true safety extends beyond merely preventing errors; it encompasses a holistic approach to responding when errors inevitably occur.
Cultural Transformation: The most significant implication is the potential for a fundamental cultural transformation within healthcare. Moving away from a "shame and blame" culture towards one of transparency, empathy, and collective learning is essential for continuous improvement. When providers feel safe to report errors and openly discuss adverse events without fear of punitive repercussions, invaluable lessons are learned, and systemic vulnerabilities are identified and addressed. This fosters an environment where patient safety is genuinely prioritized, not just in policy, but in practice.
Enhanced Patient-Centered Care: Restorative practices and CANDOR align perfectly with the principles of patient-centered care. By placing the patient and family at the heart of the response to harm, acknowledging their suffering, and involving them in the resolution process, healthcare organizations can rebuild trust and empower patients. This approach respects their dignity and their need for answers, closure, and sometimes, involvement in preventing similar harm to others.
Professional Resilience and Well-being: For healthcare providers, the implications are equally significant. By providing structured support and a compassionate pathway for addressing their involvement in adverse events, these practices contribute directly to professional resilience and combat burnout. Recognizing providers as "second victims" and offering them resources for healing helps to sustain a dedicated and compassionate workforce, which is vital for the long-term health of the healthcare system.
Sustainable Improvement: The focus on systemic investigation and learning embedded in CANDOR ensures that responses to harm are not isolated incidents but opportunities for sustainable improvement. By identifying root causes and implementing robust corrective actions, healthcare organizations can create safer environments, reducing the likelihood of future harm. This data-driven, learning-oriented approach is critical for advancing patient safety standards across the board.
Legal and Ethical Evolution: While challenges remain, the increasing adoption of CANDOR suggests a potential evolution in legal and ethical frameworks surrounding medical error. As more states and institutions demonstrate the benefits of open communication and resolution, there may be further legislative or regulatory support for these approaches, reducing the perceived legal risks and encouraging wider adoption. Ethically, these practices uphold principles of truth-telling, accountability, and compassion, reinforcing the moral foundation of healthcare.
The "Healing After Harm" initiative by CAPS represents more than just a series of events; it embodies a strategic commitment to fostering a healthcare environment where adverse events, while tragic, become catalysts for profound healing, learning, and systemic improvement. It is a powerful call to action for all stakeholders to embrace a more humane and effective way forward.
Join the Continuing Dialogue:
Webinar attendees and all interested parties are strongly encouraged to participate in the follow-up discussion to delve deeper into these crucial topics. This interactive session provides an invaluable opportunity to ask questions, share insights, and contribute to the collective advancement of restorative practices in healthcare.
Follow-up Discussion:
Thursday, January 30, 2020, at Noon Central Time
Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/369235157
You can also dial in using your phone.
United States: +1 (872) 240-3212
Access Code: 369-235-157
This ongoing conversation is vital for building a future where healing, transparency, and continuous learning are integral to the fabric of healthcare delivery, ensuring that harm, when it occurs, leads not to silence and suffering, but to understanding, resolution, and a stronger, safer system for all.
